Bitcoin News and Finance Former FTX Boss Speaks at Dealbook Event, Says He ‘Didn’t Knowingly Co-Mingle Funds’ Skip to main content

Former FTX Boss Speaks at Dealbook Event, Says He ‘Didn’t Knowingly Co-Mingle Funds’

Former FTX Boss Speaks at Dealbook Event, Says He 'Didn’t Knowingly Co-Mingle Funds'

On Nov. 30, 2022, the former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) discussed FTX’s collapse at the New York Times’ Dealbook Summit with Andrew Ross Sorkin in his first live-appearance interview since the crypto exchange’s downfall. SBF told the Dealbook Summit host that he was “deeply sorry about what happened” and further stressed that he “didn’t knowingly co-mingle funds.”

NYT Dealbook Summit Host Andrew Ross Sorkin Questions Sam Bankman-Fried, Former FTX CEO to Appear on Good Morning America

FTX co-founder and former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) sat down for a long interview with Andrew Ross Sorkin, the host of the New York Times’ (NYT) Dealbook Summit. SBF’s Dealbook appearance followed the SBF interview published the day prior with crypto supporter and reporter, Tiffany Fong. Appearing virtually at the NYT conference, SBF was asked whether or not he was worried about criminal charges being brought against him.

“There’s a time and a place for me to think about myself and my own future,” SBF told the NYT Dealbook event host. “I don’t think this is it.” The former FTX CEO explained that he was still located in the Bahamas and that coming back to the U.S. has crossed his mind. “I’ve thought about coming to the U.S.,” the former FTX executive said.

As far as his net worth, SBF said there are no hidden funds, he has “close to nothing” left and he was down to a single credit card. Sorkin asked when SBF realized things were going downhill and SBF replied it was Nov. 6 and at that point “we were putting together all the information.”

As far as Alameda Research is concerned, SBF seemed to shift the blame away from his role by insisting he “didn’t know the size of their position.” “I wasn’t running Alameda,” SBF said fidgeting in his chair. “I didn’t know exactly what was going on.” In the interview, SBF told Sorkin that he thought it was possible FTX customers could get their money back and cited how Bitfinex made customers whole after the exchange was hacked in 2016.

“I obviously wish that I spent more time dwelling on the downsides and less time thinking about the upsides,” SBF said. The FTX co-founder also remarked that he “didn’t knowingly co-mingle funds” and he couldn’t recall a time when he told a lie. SBF said:

I was as truthful as I’m knowledgeable to be — I don’t know of times when I lied.

Sorkin asked SBF whether or not the company had any formal corporate board structures and SBF replied that there were too many boards across the FTX empire. While FTX had a slew of board members, when it came to risk management SBF told the Dealbook attendees that he “completely failed” on that end. “There was no person in charge of positional risk on FTX,” SBF admitted. The NYT reporter also asked SBF what he thought about the idea that the FTX empire was simply “a bunch of kids on Adderall having a sleepover.” SBF responded:

Look, I screwed up. We messed up big.

SBF also contended that his parents and his upbringing had nothing to do with the FTX collapse. When asked what he told his parents about the situation, SBF said: “Hey guys, I think there might be a problem … Looks like Alameda’s position might be imploding here.” SBF touched up on his political contributions and he said “my donations were mostly for pandemic prevention.” Bankman-Fried’s brother operated the left-leaning advocacy group Guarding Against Pandemics. “That was the primary thing that I was supporting with those contributions,” SBF told the Dealbook Summit host.

During his video call, SBF was of the opinion that all of FTX’s American customers would be made whole, but didn’t really detail how that was the case. He noted that he was “confused” why FTX US customers were not allowed to process withdrawals. “Whatever happened, why it happened, I had a duty to our stakeholders, our customers, our investors, the regulators of the world, to do right by them,” SBF remarked to Sorkin. “Clearly, I didn’t do a good job of that. I didn’t ever try to commit fraud on anyone.”

In addition to the NYT Dealbook video appearance with Sorkin, Bankman-Fried also discussed the subject with the broadcast Good Morning America, and the show will air on December 1, 2022. In a video clip published by GMA, SBF tells the host George Stephanopoulos “I wasn’t spending any time or effort trying to manage risk.”

What do you think about the NYT Dealbook Summit interview with Sam Bankman-Fried and Andrew Ross Sorkin? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Custodial Lightning Network Service Attack Discovered by LN ‘Newbie’ — Hacker Strikes 6 LN Custodians

On September 18, a Redditor posted to the r/bitcoin forum and explained how he discovered a way to “attack [the] lightning Network’s custodial services.” The Reddit account dubbed “Reckless Satoshi” wanted to figure out if a “discrepancy between real routing fees and service’s transaction fee can be exploited for a profit.” The researcher disclosed that he wanted to see how large the damage could be and said “it is bad.” 6 Lightning Network Custodial Services Attacked, Researcher Discloses Findings to Offenders Prior to Public Disclosure A Redditor called Reckless Satoshi published a disclosure post on r/bitcoin this past Saturday and disclosed how he had found a vulnerability with routing fees and some of the Lightning Network’s custodial services. The research attack was done in good faith and after it was complete he disclosed the bugs to the offending services before publishing his findings. Reckless Satoshi used the Lightning Network (LN) attack on six different services incl...

Axie Infinity Down 40% Since Last Week’s Price High, Protocol Revenue Outshines Competitors

Last week, the game token leveraged within the Axie Infinity gaming universe skyrocketed to all-time highs, while other crypto markets remained extremely lackluster. During the last seven days, Axie Infinity’s platform token has dropped significantly in value shedding more than 12%. Meanwhile, the game platform’s smooth love potion token has slid over 8% over the last 24 hours. Axie Infinity Down More Than 40% Since All-Time High Not too long ago, the axie infinity (AXS) token was a topical conversation because it reached an all-time high on July 15. At the time, AXS managed to capture $28.93 per unit and since then it has shed 12.8% during the last seven days. The axie infinity (AXS) token is used within the blockchain-based game that involves battles between token-based creatures called “Axies.” AXS is used for the game’s governance system as well as other actions within the game. At the time of writing axie infinity (AXS) is exchanging hands for $16.70 per coin. AXS/USD on Ju...

Play-to-Earn Game From Polker (PKR) Exchange Listing – Endorsed by Akon

The Play-to-Earn NFT based Polker.Game ‘s native token $PKR has been officially listed on the popular centralized exchange BitMart. Polker.game has been in the spotlight recently as Akon, the American R&B superstar and record producer gave his official endorsement of polker stating that the “game is revolutionary” and that Polker is “hands down.. the best play to earn, NFT game in the space.”. With the BitMart listing and celebrity endorsement from Akon, Polker is perfectly positioned to become a major player in the Play-to-Earn league. Watch Akon’s Video Here What is Play-to-Earn? Although not a new concept, play-to-earn has become a trending term due to the popularity of the NFT game AXIE infinity. In the past, previous play-to-earn games have also achieved success – however, thanks to the huge amount of development in the blockchain space in recent years the gaming experience is now massively improved. Play-to-Earn games are essentially free to play and open to anyone and...

China to Crack Down on Copyright Infringement Through NFTs

Authorities in China are going after creators of digital collectibles based on other people’s works of art, the use of which was not authorized. The government offensive is part of a campaign to combat online copyright infringement and piracy with the participation of several departments. Regulators in China Move to Strengthen Copyright Supervision of Online Platforms The National Copyright Administration of China (NCAC) has recently launched a campaign against copyright infringement and piracy on the internet, together with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, and the State Internet Information Office of the People’s Republic. A major objective of the initiative is to improve copyright supervision of online businesses by investigating cases involving the sale and distribution of infringing products on short video, live broadcast and e-commerce platforms, and promptly dealing with infringing content, the agency announced in a press r...
Blogarama - Blog Directory