Bitcoin News and Finance
An In-Depth Look at Binances TRO Opposition Filing Insists SEC Manufactured an Emergency for Its Own Purposes Skip to main content

An In-Depth Look at Binances TRO Opposition Filing Insists SEC Manufactured an Emergency for Its Own Purposes

An In-Depth Look at Binance's TRO Opposition, Filing Insists SEC Manufactured an Emergency 'for Its Own Purposes'

Binance fired back at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s temporary restraining order (TRO) request on Monday, assuring the court that “there is no risk” to customer assets. The exchange’s legal team dismissed the notion of an “emergency,” claiming that it is “manufactured by the SEC for its own purposes.”

‘Why Now?’—Binance Hits Back at SEC’s TRO Bid, Questions Timing and Urgency

Approximately a week ago, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made a move to secure a court’s approval in order to freeze the assets of Binance US, the United States subsidiary of Binance. The SEC’s aim behind filing for a temporary restraining order was to safeguard customer assets, as stated in their request. However, Binance responded on June 12 by opposing the TRO request and asserting that there is no urgent situation and that customer assets are secure.

According to Binance’s legal team, if the SEC had been aware of Binance’s regulatory violations and its open provision of services to U.S. customers for an extended period, they question “Why did the SEC let these platforms grow to their current size if it was always illegal?” Additionally, the lawyers highlight the fact that the SEC filed a lawsuit against Coinbase the very next day, prompting them to insist that the SEC provide a satisfactory response to the fundamental question of “Why now?” The attorneys firmly argue that the request for a temporary restraining order is “unwarranted and improper,” as they perceive it to be based on the “unfounded and subjective worries” of the SEC’s staff.

SEC ‘Does Not Have Authority’ Requiring Registration When Crypto Registration Definitions Have Not Been Defined by the U.S. Government

“The case alleges only registration violations against [Binance Holdings Limited (BHL)] and only control person liability for registration violations against Mr. Zhao,” the court filing details. “The SEC’s brief does not identify a single instance in which BAM customer assets were mishandled or misused. Its charges against BHL and Mr. Zhao, focused exclusively on failure to register, do not demonstrate that the dramatic remedies the SEC seeks are justified at all.” Furthermore, Binance vehemently asserts that the SEC lacks legal grounds due to the absence of a proper definition for crypto assets by Congress or under federal securities laws.

The lawyers’ state:

The SEC does not have authority to require registration when it has not answered the threshold question of what cryptocurrency assets, if any, constitute securities under federal securities laws. This complex question is the subject of intense debate and extensive legal proceedings across the nation.

Binance’s stance aligns with the concerns raised by numerous other cryptocurrency enterprises, emphasizing the crucial fact that the U.S. government has yet to establish a clear definition distinguishing crypto assets as either securities or commodities. In a public statement, SEC Chair Gary Gensler acknowledged that bitcoin (BTC) does not fall within the purview of federal securities laws. However, he also expressed his belief that the majority of contemporary crypto assets should be classified as securities, with only enforcement actions providing specific instances of the U.S. regulatory body designating certain assets as investment contracts.

“Because if the SEC cannot establish that registration was required (be it for offers and sales of securities, as an exchange, as a broker-dealer, or as a clearing agency), it cannot prevail on the merits,” Binance’s lawyers explain.

Although Binance’s legal team opposes the temporary restraining order (TRO) request, they express openness to a proposed consent order (PCO) that would entail Binance US refraining from transferring assets to its parent company or any other entities. The PCO would also facilitate “accounting and expedited discovery,” and as a gesture of good faith, all private keys and administrative keys would be provided to the government. Moreover, Binance asserts that the company and its CEO, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), have been in communication with the SEC since 2021. The lawyers further claim, however, that BHL and CZ were unaware of being targeted by the SEC until February 2023.

What are your thoughts on Binance’s legal battle with the SEC? Do you believe the SEC’s emergency claim is justified, or is it indeed manufactured for its own purposes?

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Custodial Lightning Network Service Attack Discovered by LN ‘Newbie’ — Hacker Strikes 6 LN Custodians

On September 18, a Redditor posted to the r/bitcoin forum and explained how he discovered a way to “attack [the] lightning Network’s custodial services.” The Reddit account dubbed “Reckless Satoshi” wanted to figure out if a “discrepancy between real routing fees and service’s transaction fee can be exploited for a profit.” The researcher disclosed that he wanted to see how large the damage could be and said “it is bad.” 6 Lightning Network Custodial Services Attacked, Researcher Discloses Findings to Offenders Prior to Public Disclosure A Redditor called Reckless Satoshi published a disclosure post on r/bitcoin this past Saturday and disclosed how he had found a vulnerability with routing fees and some of the Lightning Network’s custodial services. The research attack was done in good faith and after it was complete he disclosed the bugs to the offending services before publishing his findings. Reckless Satoshi used the Lightning Network (LN) attack on six different services incl
Post a Comment
Read more

Axie Infinity Down 40% Since Last Week’s Price High, Protocol Revenue Outshines Competitors

Last week, the game token leveraged within the Axie Infinity gaming universe skyrocketed to all-time highs, while other crypto markets remained extremely lackluster. During the last seven days, Axie Infinity’s platform token has dropped significantly in value shedding more than 12%. Meanwhile, the game platform’s smooth love potion token has slid over 8% over the last 24 hours. Axie Infinity Down More Than 40% Since All-Time High Not too long ago, the axie infinity (AXS) token was a topical conversation because it reached an all-time high on July 15. At the time, AXS managed to capture $28.93 per unit and since then it has shed 12.8% during the last seven days. The axie infinity (AXS) token is used within the blockchain-based game that involves battles between token-based creatures called “Axies.” AXS is used for the game’s governance system as well as other actions within the game. At the time of writing axie infinity (AXS) is exchanging hands for $16.70 per coin. AXS/USD on Ju
Post a Comment
Read more

Play-to-Earn Game From Polker (PKR) Exchange Listing – Endorsed by Akon

The Play-to-Earn NFT based Polker.Game ‘s native token $PKR has been officially listed on the popular centralized exchange BitMart. Polker.game has been in the spotlight recently as Akon, the American R&B superstar and record producer gave his official endorsement of polker stating that the “game is revolutionary” and that Polker is “hands down.. the best play to earn, NFT game in the space.”. With the BitMart listing and celebrity endorsement from Akon, Polker is perfectly positioned to become a major player in the Play-to-Earn league. Watch Akon’s Video Here What is Play-to-Earn? Although not a new concept, play-to-earn has become a trending term due to the popularity of the NFT game AXIE infinity. In the past, previous play-to-earn games have also achieved success – however, thanks to the huge amount of development in the blockchain space in recent years the gaming experience is now massively improved. Play-to-Earn games are essentially free to play and open to anyone and
Post a Comment
Read more

China to Crack Down on Copyright Infringement Through NFTs

Authorities in China are going after creators of digital collectibles based on other people’s works of art, the use of which was not authorized. The government offensive is part of a campaign to combat online copyright infringement and piracy with the participation of several departments. Regulators in China Move to Strengthen Copyright Supervision of Online Platforms The National Copyright Administration of China (NCAC) has recently launched a campaign against copyright infringement and piracy on the internet, together with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, and the State Internet Information Office of the People’s Republic. A major objective of the initiative is to improve copyright supervision of online businesses by investigating cases involving the sale and distribution of infringing products on short video, live broadcast and e-commerce platforms, and promptly dealing with infringing content, the agency announced in a press r
Post a Comment
Read more
Blogarama - Blog Directory