Bitcoin News and Finance
SEC Makes ‘Materially False and Misleading’ Representations Against Crypto Firm — Judge Threatens Sanctions Skip to main content

SEC Makes ‘Materially False and Misleading’ Representations Against Crypto Firm — Judge Threatens Sanctions

SEC Made 'Materially False and Misleading' Representations Against Crypto Firm — Judge Threatens Sanctions

The United States District Court for the District of Utah has expressed concerns that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is making “materially false and misleading representations” in its lawsuit against a crypto firm. The court has ordered the securities regulator to show cause why it should not be subject to sanctions.

Court Threatens to Sanction SEC

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is facing renewed scrutiny for its actions in yet another legal battle involving a cryptocurrency firm.

The United States District Court for the District of Utah issued an order to show cause in the SEC v. Digital Licensing Inc. dba Debt Box, et al. case on Nov. 30, demanding the securities watchdog justify its actions. The court called out the SEC for making “materially false and misleading representations” and warned of potential sanctions if the regulator fails to provide adequate justification. The order states:

The court orders the Commission to show cause why the court should not impose sanctions.

The court is concerned about how the SEC obtained an ex parte temporary restraining order (TRO) against crypto firm Debt Box and related parties. The securities regulator requested a TRO in July. Following a hearing, the court granted the TRO, which included freezing Debt Box’s assets. Multiple defendants subsequently filed Motions to Dissolve the TRO. After a hearing, the court dissolved the TRO, concluding that it was “improvidently issued because the Commission had not shown irreparable harm.”

“TROs are extraordinary relief,” the order describes, adding that among other things, the TRO obtained in this case froze “all monies and assets . . . in all accounts” held by the defendants and related parties, and mandated that they repatriate their assets. Moreover, it was the basis of the Temporary Receivership Order, which gave the receiver “full power over all funds, assets, collateral, premises … and other property belonging to” Debt Box, its affiliates, and its subsidiaries.

The court order states:

After carefully reviewing the Commission’s filings and statements at the ex parte TRO hearing, the court is concerned the Commission made materially false and misleading representations that violated Rule 11(b) and undermined the integrity of the proceedings.

In its order, the court directed the SEC to address several critical issues. One pertains to the SEC’s claim that the defendants are actively attempting to transfer assets and investor funds overseas. The court has requested “factual support” from the SEC to substantiate this allegation. Secondly, the court has inquired about the SEC’s assertion that the defendants have obstructed the SEC’s investigation by blocking access to their social media sites and potentially deleting training materials related to the alleged scheme. Moreover, the court has asked the SEC to clarify the statement made at the TRO hearing regarding the closure of additional bank accounts by the defendants. The SEC has been granted 14 days to respond to this order.

The SEC recently lost several legal battles against crypto firms. “A troubling pattern emerges,” Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, commented on social media platform X Friday as he highlighted specific instances where the SEC’s actions were deemed questionable by the courts. On July 12, 2022, the court found that the SEC’s actions demonstrated “hypocrisy” by making consistent arguments to the court and not acting out a “faithful allegiance to the law,” Alderoty detailed. On June 6 this year, the court ruled that the SEC had neglected its duty to respond in good faith to Coinbase’s petition for crypto rulemaking. In addition, the court determined on Aug. 29 in the Grayscale v. SEC case that the SEC’s “inconsistent treatment of similar products is arbitrary and capricious.”

What do you think about the court calling out the SEC for making materially false and misleading representations against a crypto firm and threatening to sanction the regulator? Let us know in the comments section below.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Custodial Lightning Network Service Attack Discovered by LN ‘Newbie’ — Hacker Strikes 6 LN Custodians

On September 18, a Redditor posted to the r/bitcoin forum and explained how he discovered a way to “attack [the] lightning Network’s custodial services.” The Reddit account dubbed “Reckless Satoshi” wanted to figure out if a “discrepancy between real routing fees and service’s transaction fee can be exploited for a profit.” The researcher disclosed that he wanted to see how large the damage could be and said “it is bad.” 6 Lightning Network Custodial Services Attacked, Researcher Discloses Findings to Offenders Prior to Public Disclosure A Redditor called Reckless Satoshi published a disclosure post on r/bitcoin this past Saturday and disclosed how he had found a vulnerability with routing fees and some of the Lightning Network’s custodial services. The research attack was done in good faith and after it was complete he disclosed the bugs to the offending services before publishing his findings. Reckless Satoshi used the Lightning Network (LN) attack on six different services incl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Axie Infinity Down 40% Since Last Week’s Price High, Protocol Revenue Outshines Competitors

Last week, the game token leveraged within the Axie Infinity gaming universe skyrocketed to all-time highs, while other crypto markets remained extremely lackluster. During the last seven days, Axie Infinity’s platform token has dropped significantly in value shedding more than 12%. Meanwhile, the game platform’s smooth love potion token has slid over 8% over the last 24 hours. Axie Infinity Down More Than 40% Since All-Time High Not too long ago, the axie infinity (AXS) token was a topical conversation because it reached an all-time high on July 15. At the time, AXS managed to capture $28.93 per unit and since then it has shed 12.8% during the last seven days. The axie infinity (AXS) token is used within the blockchain-based game that involves battles between token-based creatures called “Axies.” AXS is used for the game’s governance system as well as other actions within the game. At the time of writing axie infinity (AXS) is exchanging hands for $16.70 per coin. AXS/USD on Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Play-to-Earn Game From Polker (PKR) Exchange Listing – Endorsed by Akon

The Play-to-Earn NFT based Polker.Game ‘s native token $PKR has been officially listed on the popular centralized exchange BitMart. Polker.game has been in the spotlight recently as Akon, the American R&B superstar and record producer gave his official endorsement of polker stating that the “game is revolutionary” and that Polker is “hands down.. the best play to earn, NFT game in the space.”. With the BitMart listing and celebrity endorsement from Akon, Polker is perfectly positioned to become a major player in the Play-to-Earn league. Watch Akon’s Video Here What is Play-to-Earn? Although not a new concept, play-to-earn has become a trending term due to the popularity of the NFT game AXIE infinity. In the past, previous play-to-earn games have also achieved success – however, thanks to the huge amount of development in the blockchain space in recent years the gaming experience is now massively improved. Play-to-Earn games are essentially free to play and open to anyone and...
Post a Comment
Read more

China to Crack Down on Copyright Infringement Through NFTs

Authorities in China are going after creators of digital collectibles based on other people’s works of art, the use of which was not authorized. The government offensive is part of a campaign to combat online copyright infringement and piracy with the participation of several departments. Regulators in China Move to Strengthen Copyright Supervision of Online Platforms The National Copyright Administration of China (NCAC) has recently launched a campaign against copyright infringement and piracy on the internet, together with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, and the State Internet Information Office of the People’s Republic. A major objective of the initiative is to improve copyright supervision of online businesses by investigating cases involving the sale and distribution of infringing products on short video, live broadcast and e-commerce platforms, and promptly dealing with infringing content, the agency announced in a press r...
Post a Comment
Read more
Blogarama - Blog Directory